![]() ![]() Having only four or five RBs did not lead to better teams in any metric. We can clearly see that having a similar number of RBs and WRs should be your goal when drafting Superflex teams on Underdog. You can also pass on an elite TE and grab three late and hope you nail a high-ceiling outcome like Evan Engram was last year.īelow is a table showing the top 15 most common roster constructions the simulation produced. If you draft Travis Kelce, you likely don’t need three TEs, and may be able to get away with only drafting one. I would say you want to structure your teams based on where you draft TEs. There isn’t really a clear takeaway, with many of the results being similar. The ideal number of tight ends is kind of all over the place. That dynamic doesn’t exactly exist for late-round WRs. The elite WRs like Justin Jefferson and Tyreek Hill were much more consistent last year than a lot of RBs last year, and you can find high-level RBs late that earn unexpected playing time due to injuries to starters. One fewer WR spot really does make it so that you don’t have to load up on WRs if you can nail elite WRs earlier. Since we saw more RBs lead to higher scores, it makes sense that we see more WRs lead to lower scores. We do see around seven RBs to be the sweet spot for average scores and ceiling. My main takeaway was that people were drafting so many WRs before RBs that it led to great RB values in a format where you have to start the same number of WRs as RBs (non-Superflex Underdog draft rooms tend to skew heavily to WRs, so there seemed to be some carryover despite the roster format changing). It is a bit surprising to see more RBs lead to higher-scoring teams. There is nothing wrong with going with four QBs either ( Geno Smith was basically free last year and was a great fourth QB pick.) Going with two QBs can work, but you really need to nail those two. Three QBs stand out as the most optimal roster construction, with the best average regular season score, the highest floor, the second highest ceiling, and the highest average regular season score among teams with a score in the top 10% percentile. Unsurprisingly, more QBs led to higher-scoring teams. Ideally, you will be starting two QBs each week, as they are the highest-scoring players in fantasy football.īelow is a table showing how teams scored based on the number of QBs on the roster: This means that instead of having to play three WRs, you can play an additional QB, but also another RB or TE as well. ![]() Instead of starting three WRs each week, one of those WR spots is now a Superflex spot. There is a major difference in the roster requirements for this tournament compared to non-Superflex tournaments in best ball. Underdog Fantasy Superflex Roster Structure Other than that, I let the simulation run to get a wide variety of possible team combinations based on ADP. The only restriction I put on the simulation was limiting rosters to a maximum of four QBs, nine RBs, 10 WRs, and three TEs. It is important to point out that the simulated data is likely not a perfect representation of human drafting - the simulation did not try to intentionally stack players from the same team, for example. From that point, I just went week-by-week to figure out the weekly scores for each team based on their roster of players to find out their regular-season total score. Using the ADP from last year’s Big Board Superflex, I was able to simulate 5,000 drafts to give me simulated pick-by-pick data for 60,000 teams. You’ll also want to subscribe to the Fantasy Points YouTube Channel, where we have been doing Underdog best ball drafts every Wednesday night at 7:30 Eastern, including Big Board Superflex drafts. ![]() New signups to Underdog get both a deposit match of up to $100 and a Fantasy Points Standard subscription for just $5! NOTE: If you’re looking to enter a Big Board tournament or plan on drafting later in the year, we’re constantly updating our Best Ball rankings to give you the biggest edge with our friends over at Underdog Fantasy (Promo code: FANTASYPTS). There has been extensive data analysis work done on the pick-by-pick data for each of Underdog’s Best Ball Mania tournaments from the past three years, but there is no pick-by-pick data publicly available for any Superflex tournaments they have run. As you might imagine, this boosts the values of QBs immensely. In essence, a Superflex format encourages fantasy drafters and fantasy managers to start two quarterbacks, with the second eligible to start in a flex spot alongside the traditional RB/WR/TE flex positions. This Big Board is a SUPERFLEX tournament. To follow up the Big Board, Underdog has, naturally, launched a new Big Board tournament… but with a major twist. The 2023 NFL Draft is still weeks away, and one major Underdog best ball fantasy football tournament has already filled - the Big Board. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |