The Prop 65 Safe Harbor maximum allowable dose level for lead is 0.5 micrograms per day, but the FDA daily limits are set at 75 micrograms for adults and 6 micrograms for children. International standards vary, but typically are set around 5 ppm. The federal safety standard set by the FDA for lead in dietary supplements is a maximum 10 ppm. However, keeping those levels far below the national standards is definitely possible. This is why it’s virtually impossible to manufacture natural herb products that don’t contain trace amounts of lead, especially for herbal roots. Other vegetables, such as beets and carrots, can have over 6 ppm. Even when grown in soil with lower lead content (500 ppm), vegetables such as spinach and radishes can contain enough lead to exceed 3 ppm. Granted, these are contaminated areas usually near factories. When you account for the amount of lead in the soil from man-made pollution, some areas contain up to 10,000 ppm. According to the EPA, natural levels of lead in soil can range from 50 parts per million (ppm) to 400 ppm. Continuing with the example of lead, which is naturally occurring throughout the environment and notably in our soil, we see a stark contrast between Prop 65 and the national standards. One of the interesting aspects of Prop 65 is how different it is from all of the other national standards set by organizations such as the FDA and EPA. Fresh, boiled brussel sprouts - 7.9 mcgĨ x higher lead-count than the Prop 65 limit:Ĭalifornia’s Prop 65 vs National Standards.Roasted mixed nuts (no peanuts) - 10.2 mcgġ6 x higher lead-count than the Prop 65 limit:.For example, take a look at the naturally occurring lead counts in the foods below.Ģ4x higher lead-count than the Prop 65 limit: In most instances, the exposure levels determined by Prop 65 are lower than what occurs naturally in fruits, vegetables, grains, and even drinking water. In fact, the Safe Harbor levels are so low for many common chemicals that they’re virtually impossible to not surpass. Yet, Safe Harbor levels are frequently around 1,000 times lower than levels set by the FDA, EPA and WHO. Prop 65 sets a “Safe Harbor” exposure level for a lot of the listed chemicals and amounts less than the Safe Harbor level require no warning label. However, Prop 65 requires a warning label on any product containing a single chemical from their list, but does not require companies to disclose the actual chemical or amount of chemical present. Byproducts from manufacturing or chemical processes.The Prop 65 list contains a broad range of naturally occurring and synthetic chemicals that are known by the state of California to cause cancer or birth defects or other reproductive harm. You can download the latest version of the list here. What ingredients are included in Prop 65?Ĭurrently, there are over 800 chemicals identified by the State of California as carcinogens and reproductive toxins that require the Prop 65 warning. To accomplish this, businesses are required to post in-store signs and/or warning labels on specific products. Businesses to warn consumers of any possible exposure to one of the chemicals on the list, despite the actual amount of ingredient or realistic risk of exposure. The list total is over 800 chemicals and counting. Each new chemical discovered is added to a list managed by the state. Prop 65 requires: The State of California to identify chemicals that could potentially cause cancer, birth defects, or reproductive harm. It’s questionable whether or not the burden placed on California businesses has been worth it. Although the intentions behind Prop 65 were to improve public health, very little improvement has actually resulted. In 1986, environmental and public health activists persuaded California voters to approve the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act - more commonly known as Proposition 65 or Prop 65. However, we’re going to do our best to break down Prop 65 for you and let you draw your own conclusion. This leads to the question you are probably asking - if the warnings on the Prop 65 labels are true, how are these products still on the market? As with many California regulations, it’s hard to find a straightforward explanation. However, the products forced to use these labels already meet or exceed current regulations to be sold legally. These labels are infamous for their severe warnings and it’s only normal to be concerned when you see such warnings on something you are about to consume. If you’re a California resident or you’ve purchased supplements from California, by now you’ve probably seen the Prop 65 warning label that’s placed on thousands of products.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |